Buscando material nuevo para mi tienda me encontré con la portada de una película con la pic que tengo allá arriba ↑ y me dió curiosidad saber en que consistía el tal estatuto que no me permitía ver pues resulta que no sólo afecta a los que venden porno online como decía el artículo que encontré en la red acerca de este asunto sino afecta garantías constitucionales porque puede ir a prisión cualquiera que ponga fotos sexualmente explícitas (buzo bolux!) y no tenga record de la documentación que acredite que los involucrados son mayores de edad disponible al menos 20 horas a la semana por 5 años para que pueda ser inspeccionado sin previo aviso:
How? The new regulations expand the definition of a so-called "secondary producer" of materials to include anyone "who inserts on a computer site or service a digital image of" sexually explicit conduct. If you're a blogger or you host a website and write an online article or personal ad with a photo that falls under that definition, that means you.
It's easy to see how quickly this requirement could stop lots of legitimate speech and expression, covering material that's well outside the basic definitions of commercial porn. Consider the blogger who writes a post on the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal and wants to post some of the existing or soon to be released sexually explicit photos of prisoner abuse. (Even if the pictures were blurred, under 18 U.S.C. § 2256, the regulations would likely still apply, since the definition of "sexually explicit conduct" includes "sadistic or masochistic abuse.")
It's easy to see how quickly this requirement could stop lots of legitimate speech and expression, covering material that's well outside the basic definitions of commercial porn. Consider the blogger who writes a post on the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal and wants to post some of the existing or soon to be released sexually explicit photos of prisoner abuse. (Even if the pictures were blurred, under 18 U.S.C. § 2256, the regulations would likely still apply, since the definition of "sexually explicit conduct" includes "sadistic or masochistic abuse.")
Under the new regulations, the blogger:
is a "secondary producer" and required to keep records of the ages of the participants and copies of their photo IDs; and
is required to list a street address where the government may inspect these records without notice (and keep it open 20 hours a week for at least the next five years).
Por supuesto que los defensores de la libertad de expresión en los US pusieron el grito en el cielo pero todavía no se resuelve nada en los tribunales de ese país, a ver en que resulta esto.
4 comentarios:
aunque no todos pueden ingles.. pero siempre hay algo nuevo que aprender..
la verdad todo lo q dice en ingles ya lo explique :p
Pues pongase al tiro mi buen, no me lo vayan a acusar de pedofilo! :D
Juep...!
F. Debugger
Publicar un comentario